The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) rejected Calin Georgescu’s bid to overturn the annulment of Romania’s 2024 presidential election, declaring his case "inadmissible" in a final ruling. (Photo by Andrei Pungovschi/Getty Images)

News

Europe’s top human rights court rejects Georgescu’s Romanian election annulment challenge

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has rejected Călin Georgescu’s bid to overturn the annulment of Romania’s November 2024 presidential election, declaring his case "inadmissible" in a final ruling

Share

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has rejected Călin Georgescu’s bid to overturn the annulment of Romania’s November 2024 presidential election, declaring his case “inadmissible” in a final ruling.

Right-wing independent presidential candidate Calin Georgescu won the first round of the election in which a viral TikTok campaign seemed to play a part.

Just before the second round, Romania’s Constitutional Court on December 6 cancelled the entire ballot, citing claims of “Russian interference”.

Following the decision of the Romanian authorities, Georgescu challenged it in the ECHR, the top European human rights court.

He argued that the annulment had violated his right to free elections under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, arguing that the decision was illegal, disproportionate and politically motivated.

The Strasbourg-based ECHR ruled that Article 3 — guaranteeing free elections — applied only to legislative elections, not presidential ones.

Since Romania’s Constitution explicitly separated the presidency from the legislature, the court rejected Georgescu’s primary claim.

He also invoked Articles 6 (fair trial), 10 (free speech), 11 (freedom of assembly) and 13 (effective remedy), arguing that he had no legal way to challenge the annulment and that the process was politically tainted.

Again, the court dismissed his case.

Regarding Articles 6 and 13, it ruled that running for president was a political right, not a civil one — meaning Georgescu had no valid claim under the ECHR.

“The right in this case, to stand for election, was a political right and not concerned with ‘civil rights and obligations’,” the court ruled.

Concerning articles 10 and 11, it argued that Geogescu did not provide sufficient claims.

“The court found that Mr Georgescu did not raise any factual or legal arguments in support of his claim of ‘political interference’ in the electoral process. It therefore rejected this part of the application as manifestly ill-founded,” it decreed.

With Europe’s highest human rights court slamming the door on his challenge, Georgescu’s fight to reclaim Romania’s presidency appeared all but over.

It was not the first time the ECHR had shut down Georgescu’s appeals.

In January this year, he petitioned the court to reinstate the annulled first-round results but the judges rejected his request, stating it fell “outside the scope of application of Rule 39”.

The same month, a Romanian court also dismissed his attempt to challenge the Constitutional Court’s decision to scrap the November 24 presidential elections.

The rulings from multiple courts may contribute to the perception that Georgescu was left facing insurmountable legal and institutional barriers to his attaining office.

The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) has accused European Union leaders of orchestrating charges against Georgescu to suppress what it called a “non-systemic” candidate.

SVR claimed the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had pressured Romania with threats of cutting EU funds if Georsgescu continued his campaign.

In a press release published on March 4, Romania’s foreign ministry rejected SVR’s claims, calling them “ridiculous and inappropriate”.

“These are part of a series of hybrid actions carried out by the Russian Federation to undermine democracy in Romania,” it added.